yibie/awesome-jev

★ 489⑂ 67

A curated list of public projects, integrations, and discussions built on Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.

About yibie/awesome-jev

yibie/awesome-jev is an open-source project on GitHub, mainly written in Python. A curated list of public projects, integrations, and discussions built on Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions. It currently holds 489 stars and 67 forks with 0 open issues, and was last pushed on an unknown date (repository created unknown).

Project Overview

AI Homed tracks it on the Today's Trending board, currently at rank #70 with 0 new stars today.

GitHub Repository Details

Repository yibie/awesome-jev · default branch - · size 0 KB · watchers 0 · source: GitHub REST API and repository README

README

awesome-jev

A curated awesome list of public projects and practices built on Jev, TypeSafe AI's System One model for typed decisions.

This README is the homepage aggregate of the current category files, so the latest accepted entries are visible here without drilling into subpages.

Jev is not a chat model. It takes unstructured state plus a typed question and returns a typed decision — a choice, a score, or a boolean, each with a confidence. That makes it a drop-in decision layer for software: classification, routing, rubric scoring, verification, and agent guardrails. This list tracks who is actually building with it, and which patterns transfer across industries.

The repository treats all categories equally — each entry lives in exactly one category, chosen by its direct Jev application domain. A dedicated Related Practices / Discussions category captures credible public practice signals — X threads, Reddit discussions, and interviews — that describe real Jev usage even when no strong standalone case page exists yet.

[!WARNING]
A listing is not an endorsement. This project applies inclusion rules only — public, citable, genuinely uses Jev for a typed decision, one-sentence summary. It does not review code quality, security, maturity, or whether a project runs at all.
> Treat same-day bulk submissions with particular care. Several repositories published together by one author, sharing a scaffold and a thin commit history, can satisfy every inclusion rule and still be unproven. Volume is not evidence of quality. See Curation is not endorsement for a checklist to run before adopting anything here.

Why this list

Most Jev discussion is scattered across launch threads, model-gateway listings, and one-off prototypes. This list answers two practical questions quickly:

This is not a comprehensive database. It is a high-signal, fast-scanning field guide.

Inclusion criteria

An entry should meet all of the following:

We do not include:

Curation is not endorsement

Inclusion means one thing: the entry satisfies the inclusion rules above. It is not a quality review, a security audit, or a recommendation. We do not verify that a project compiles, that its tests pass, that its published numbers reproduce, or that its license permits your use.

This matters most for projects that arrive in bulk. When one author releases several repositories on the same day, they commonly share a single scaffold — the same AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, STATE.md, and CHANGELOG.md — land in one or two commits each, and may ship considerably more prose than code. Such projects can be entirely legitimate; they are simply unproven. Treat them as leads, not as validated tools.

Before adopting an entry, check it yourself:

| Check | Why it matters | | --- | --- | | Does the code actually call the Jev API? | An entry can read well on a README alone. Look for a real request carrying typed questions, and a parsed answer coming back. | | Is there a runnable check? | A test, an example with expected output, or a public demo. No check means no evidence that it works. | | Do the numbers have a source? | Any accuracy, latency, cost, or volume figure should be traceable to the linked page. We strip claims we cannot verify, but the project page itself may still carry them. | | How much of the repository is code? | Some projects are mostly prompt documents. That can be legitimate — just know which one you are getting. | | Is there a license? | A few entries have none, which limits reuse and redistribution. |

Found something wrong? Open an issue or a pull request — removal is as valid a contribution as addition. Rules for AI-assisted work, project depth, and submission rate live in CONTRIBUTING.md.

Current coverage

Open categories still being seeded

Each entry lives in exactly one category. When a project could fit multiple categories, we choose the one closest to its direct application domain.

Browse by category

Full list

Classification & Routing

Source file: categories/classification-routing.md

Verification & Guardrails

Source file: categories/verification-guardrails.md

Scoring & Ranking

Source file: categories/scoring-ranking.md

Agent Decisions

Source file: categories/agent-decisions.md

GitHub Stars & Activity

489Stars
67Forks
0Open issues
PythonLanguage

GitHub Popularity

GitHub stars489
Forks67
Open issues0
Primary languagePython
License-
Stars gained today0
Created-
Last pushed-

Trending History

Daily boardrank #70 · ▲ 0 stars

Related AI Projects

1

NousResearch / hermes-agent

Python★ 247,332⑂ 51,995
2

Significant-Gravitas / AutoGPT

Python★ 187,453⑂ 46,009▲ 30 stars
3

docling-project / docling

Python★ 67,364⑂ 4,850▲ 129 stars
4

openai / openai-python

Python★ 31,654⑂ 5,822▲ 13 stars
5

harvard-edge / cs249r_book

Python★ 28,368⑂ 3,587▲ 31 stars
6

browser-use / browser-harness

Python★ 17,826⑂ 1,748▲ 86 stars
7

FareedKhan-dev / train-llm-from-scratch

Python★ 10,015⑂ 1,390▲ 196 stars
8

zhouxiaoka / autoclip

Python★ 7,748⑂ 1,504▲ 325 stars

More AI Rankings