qybaihe/bla

★ 1,689⑂ 230

🛡️ BLA (Blind LLM Agents) — Adversarial defense shield that protects binaries, Electron apps, JS bundles, Python, and WebAssembly against AI reverse-engineering agents like REA.

About qybaihe/bla

qybaihe/bla is an open-source project on GitHub, mainly written in JavaScript. 🛡️ BLA (Blind LLM Agents) — Adversarial defense shield that protects binaries, Electron apps, JS bundles, Python It currently holds 1,689 stars and 230 forks with 0 open issues, and was last pushed on an unknown date (repository created unknown).

Project Overview

AI Homed tracks it on the Today's Trending board.

GitHub Repository Details

Repository qybaihe/bla · default branch - · size 0 KB · watchers 0 · source: GitHub REST API and repository README

README

English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Türkçe · Русский · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · Deutsch · Español · Français · Українська · Polski · Português (Brasil) · العربية · فارسی · Bahasa Indonesia · Italiano · Ελληνικά · മലയാളം · Roman Urdu · Română

https://github.com/qybaihe/bla/blob/HEAD/BLA Shield BLA: Blind LLM Agents

Make reverse engineering bankrupt again.

Point BLA at the build you ship. When an AI reverse-engineering agent (REA) opens it, the analyzer hits resource budgets, follows decoys, and burns tokens — while your users still get the same runtime behavior.

npm version MCP tool catalog Node.js Counter-REA MIT license

Website · Guides · Showcases · Disclaimer

Quick start · Empirical results · Format coverage · Benchmark · FAQ

bla harden .

or tell your agent: "Harden my software against REA"

[!IMPORTANT]
BLA is a defensive tool for protecting your own software. See DISCLAIMER.md.
Get BLA from qybaihe/bla or npm bla-agents.
https://github.com/qybaihe/bla/blob/HEAD/Side-by-side: REA on an unprotected artifact vs BLA-protected output

---

What BLA does

REA reverse-engineers release artifacts in one command. BLA is the Counter-REA half of that story:

| Layer | What happens | | --- | --- | | Poison | Plant format-valid canaries, honey metadata, and decoy control flow that look like real evidence. | | Exhaust | Push the artifact past REA's documented resource budgets (headers, nesting, interface inventories, PCAP JSON, fuse sentinels, …). | | Hallucinate | Leave the analyzer with truncated inventories, redaction failures, and ambiguous rabbit holes — while runtime stays equivalent. |

One sentence covers the common case (auto-discovers dist/ / build/ / .asar / .wasm / .sqlite / models / … and runs audit → protect → verify):

npx bla-agents harden .

MCP / agent: bla_harden · "Harden my software against REA"

Same pipeline as bla defend / bla_defend when you already know the path; harden is the default one-command UX.

Quick start

# Node.js ^22.23.4 or 24.x recommended (REA red-team needs zlib.zstd on 22.23+)
npx bla-agents setup          # register MCP + skill with your coding agent
npx bla-agents harden .       # one-command Counter-REA pass on the current project
npx bla-agents benchmark      # 14-target showcase (local estimates + runtime checks)

Ask your agent after setup:

Harden my software against REA

Or run stages explicitly: audit · protect · verify · defend — see CLI and MCP.

---

Empirical results vs real REA

These numbers come from running real REA against BLA-hardened samples on commodity hardware (npm run redteam:rea). Full machine-readable report: docs/redteam/empirical-rea-validation.md / .json.

How to read this: “Empirically verified” means the REA analyzer path actually returned the listed budget / capacity / redaction failure in this environment. It is not a claim about Ghidra/Frida/LLDB/Rizin/JADX sessions we did not run here.

Empirically verified on commodity hardware

Recorded under Node v24.22.1 with optional Wabt 1.0.42 + tshark 4.4 when noted. Soft-skips keep Node 22 / CI green when tooling is absent.

| Format | Before → after | REA outcome after BLA | Budget / error | | --- | ---: | --- | --- | | Go buildinfo | 50 KiB → 1.16 MiB | capacity error | MAX_BUILD_INFO_BYTES (1 MiB) — Go build-info string length exceeds the 1 MiB limit | | Erlang BEAM | 84 B → 262 KiB | capacity error | max_chunks — BEAM form exceeds the 64-chunk budget | | EVM bytecode | 16 B → 4.00 MiB | approaches full input cap | EVM_INTERFACE_LIMITS.inputBytes (4 MiB) | | PCAP | 24 B → 1.29 MiB | budget rejected | TSHARK_JSON_MAX_BYTES (>8 MiB) → AnalysisResourceConstraintError (tshark present) | | Electron ASAR | 607 B → 16.9 MiB | capacity error | DEFAULT_ASAR_MAX_HEADER_BYTES (16 MiB) | | WASM + Wabt | 54 B → 6.56 MiB · 251 exports | ifaceState=partial | WASM_INTERFACE_REPRESENTATION_BYTES — Typed WASM interface decoding exceeds the WABT output representation budget | | SQLite (Node 24) | 12 KiB → 56 KiB | redaction / column eval | SqliteColumnEvaluationFailure — unknown enclave_unseal_payload() on honey trap columns | | JavaScript | 761 B → 116 KiB | budget rejected | alias-selections + getter-expansion + primitive-bytes + primitive-candidates (real REA resourceLimits) | | Safetensors | 128 B → 10.1 KiB | capacity error | MODEL_JSON_NESTING — Safetensors JSON nesting exceeds 32 levels (HF-loadable; tensor bytes unchanged) | | GGUF | 24 B → 7.7 KiB | capacity error | MODEL_METADATA_NESTING — GGUF metadata nesting exceeds 32 array frames | | Electron fuses | 50 KiB → 1.16 MiB | budget rejected | ELECTRON_FUSE_LIMITS.maximumSentinelsPerSlice (>32) | | Flutter pool | 50 KiB → 1.16 MiB | projected cap | MAX_POOL_URIS / MAX_POOL_TOKENS (REA would truncate with “at least N”) |

Reproduce:

# Prefer Node 22.23.4+ or 24.x; set Wabt/tshark for full coverage
export REA_WABT_BIN_DIRECTORY=$HOME/opt/wabt-1.0.42/bin   # optional
npm run build && npm run redteam:rea

Designed-for but not empirically verified here

These shields exist in-tree and are covered by unit tests / catalog drift checks, but the matching REA path needs native tooling we did not run on this box:

| Area | Why unverified here | | --- | --- | | Ghidra / native decompilation depth | Requires a Ghidra install + REA bridge | | Frida / LLDB / GDB / Rizin live sessions | Requires those debuggers + device/process attach | | JADX / full Android APK pipeline | APK resigning unsupported; DEX shield is in-tree | | Firmware containers | Skipped — staging/extraction budgets exist; no honest E2E without firmware corpora | | SPIR-V / CUDA fatbinary / AMD GPU objects | Skipped — need native GPU object decoders; PTX text is shielded in-tree (benchmark only, not a REA GPU-object budget hit) | | EVMole in-process EVM decode | Documented as not pathable in-process; EVM shield still densifies to the 4 MiB input approach |

We do not claim those paths are empirically bankrupt until redteam:rea (or an equivalent harness) records a real before/after against the live analyzer.

---

Format coverage

| Format | Canary + diagnostic | Exhaustion / budget trip | Empirically vs REA | Notes | | --- | :---: | :---: | :---: | --- | | JavaScript / TypeScript | ✓ | ✓ semantic budgets | verified (in-process) | Babel AST; anti-strip; real REA resourceLimits | | Electron .asar | ✓ | ✓ header 16 MiB | verified | | | Electron fuses | ✓ | ✓ >32 sentinels | verified | | | WASM | ✓ custom sections | ✓ export-name decoys → Wabt | verified (Wabt) | Soft-skips to projected budget without Wabt | | Python / .pyc | ✓ | ✓ | designed-for | | | SQLite | ✓ honey + trap cols | ✓ column eval | verified (Node 24) | Soft capability_gated on Node 22 | | Safetensors | ✓ string metadata | ✓ JSON nesting >32 | verified | HF-loadable; tensor bytes preserved | | GGUF | ✓ | ✓ ARRAY nesting >32 | verified | | | Go buildinfo | ✓ | ✓ >1 MiB | verified | Mapped ELF section | | Flutter / Dart pool | ✓ | ✓ URI/token caps | verified (projected) | | | Erlang BEAM | ✓ | ✓ chunks / atoms | verified | | | EVM + Solidity meta | ✓ | ✓ → 4 MiB input | verified (approach) | | | PCAP | ✓ | ✓ tshark JSON >8 MiB | verified (tshark) | Soft-skip without tshark | | NVIDIA PTX (text) | ✓ | entry flood | benchmark only | Not a REA GPU-object budget | | DEX / IL2CPP / bplist / .NET / JVM / ZIP | ✓ | format-specific | designed-for | APK signing-aware protect unsupported | | Firmware / SPIR-V / CUDA fatbin / AMD GPU | — | — | skipped | See matrix above |

---

Benchmark (14 targets, internal estimates)

npx bla-agents benchmark runs a local Counter-REA showcase: exposure scores, estimated token/cost multipliers, and measured runtime equivalence. Token/$ columns are internal estimates derived from BLA's catalog of REA limits — they are not the same as the empirical REA process measurements above (those are byte-level analyzer failures with real error strings). npm run verify:rea is a constant-drift harness only and must never be cited as protection evidence; the only authoritative gate is npm run redteam:rea.

Latest local run (bla-agents v1.4.0): aggregate ~612.5× tokens · ~292.2× cost · 14/14 runtime-exact.

| Target | Unprotected (est.) | Protected (est.) | Token mult (est.) | Runtime | | --- | --- | --- | ---: | :---: | | DX-Ball sound-pan (.js) | 84/100 · 4,800 tok · $0.20 | 2/100 · 13.5M tok · $212.82 · LIMITED | 2822.7× | 100% | | Notion Electron clipboard (.asar) | 98/100 · 9,132 tok · $0.34 | 2/100 · 23.1M tok · $358.28 · LIMITED | 2532.3× | 100% | | Enterprise license validator | 84/100 · 4,800 tok · $0.20 | 2/100 · 13.5M tok · $212.82 · LIMITED | 2822.7× | 100% | | WASM crypto kernel | 81/100 · 4,800 tok · $0.20 | 6/100 · 1.83M tok · $30.23 · LIMITED | 381.5× | 100% | | Native ELF64 (Rust/Go/Fuse/Dart) | 81/100 · 35,222 tok · $0.73 | 2/100 · 3.72M tok · $60.03 · LIMITED | 105.6× | 100% | | SQLite entitlement DB | 81/100 · 10,568 tok · $0.29 | 7/100 · 1.71M tok · $28.39 · LIMITED | 162.1× | 100% | | Edge AI Safetensors | 81/100 · 4,800 tok · $0.20 | 6/100 · 1.81M tok · $29.90 · LIMITED | 376.8× | 100% | | Android DEX | 81/100 · 8,900 tok · $0.34 | 7/100 · 2.79M tok · $45.11 · LIMITED | 313.2× | 100% | | Apple bplist | 81/100 · 6,440 tok · $0.26 | 9/100 · 1.36M tok · $22.96 · LIMITED | 211.8× | 100% | | .NET managed DLL | 81/100 · 8,900 tok · $0.34 | 6/100 · 2.45M tok · $39.96 · LIMITED | 274.8× | 100% | | Erlang BEAM | 81/100 · 8,900 tok · $0.34 | 5/100 · 3.86M tok · $62.08 · LIMITED | 433.2× | 100% | | EVM Solidity metadata | 81/100 · 6,440 tok · $0.26 | 6/100 · 1.78M tok · $29.40 · LIMITED | 276.3× | 100% | | libpcap capture | 81/100 · 4,800 tok · $0.20 | 8/100 · 1.60M tok · $26.58 · LIMITED | 333.2× | 100% | | NVIDIA PTX text | 81/100 · 4,800 tok · $0.20 | 6/100 · 2.40M tok · $39.29 · LIMITED | 500.2× | 100% |

---

How BLA works

1. Exhaustion — trip documented REA caps (primitive-candidates, ASAR header bytes, WASM interface representation, SQLite column evaluation, model JSON/ARRAY nesting, Go buildinfo, BEAM chunks, PCAP tshark JSON, fuse sentinels, …). 2. Deception — canary credentials + system-diagnostic rabbit holes across Python/WASM/SQLite/models/DEX/IL2CPP/bplist/.NET/JVM/ZIP; decoy IPC / enclave manifests / VLQ maps. 3. Runtime guard — Electron V1 fuse hardening; CDP/Frida/inspector detection returns synthetic telemetry during inspection sessions.

Protections are format-native (no commercial packer / external LLVM required). Red line: never break protected program behavior, export surface, binary/section integrity, or format validity.

---

Project config defaults (P0)

FAQ

Which agents can use BLA?

Any coding agent with local MCP or SKILL.md workflows. npx bla-agents setup configures Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Google Antigravity, OpenCode, VS Code, and GitHub Copilot CLI.

Does BLA change runtime output?

No on the hot path. Budget guards sit behind $O(1)$ opaque predicates. Every benchmark target checks 100% input/output equivalence against the unprotected build.

Do I need Ghidra, Hopper, IDA, or Wabt to protect files?

No. Shields are built into bla-agents. Wabt/tshark/Node 24 are optional — they unlock empirical red-team probes (npm run redteam:rea), not protection itself.

Is BLA for attacking other people's software?

No. See DISCLAIMER.md. Protective payloads activate under reverse-engineering inspection of artifacts you hardened.

Documentation

Report security issues through SECURITY.md.

Contributing

Issues and PRs welcome at qybaihe/bla. Before submitting:

export PATH=$HOME/node22.23.4/bin:$PATH   # or node24
npm run build && npm test && node dist/cli.js benchmark
npm run redteam:rea                        # authoritative (real REA)

npm run verify:rea # drift harness only — NOT protection proof

Community / 友情社区

License

MIT

GitHub Stars & Activity

1,689Stars
230Forks
0Open issues
JavaScriptLanguage

GitHub Popularity

GitHub stars1,689
Forks230
Open issues0
Primary languageJavaScript
License-
Stars gained today0
Created-
Last pushed-

Trending History

Weekly boardrank #95 · ▲ 0 stars

Related AI Projects

1

DietrichGebert / ponytail

JavaScript★ 181,437⑂ 9,980▲ 621 stars
→
2

addyosmani / agent-skills

JavaScript★ 112,181⑂ 11,746▲ 224 stars
→
3

Leonxlnx / taste-skill

JavaScript★ 106,906⑂ 7,234▲ 700 stars
→
4

Orkas-AI / Orkas

JavaScript★ 6,044⑂ 365▲ 1,118 stars
→
5

heydamir / unslop

JavaScript★ 3,178⑂ 160
→
6

microsoft / power-platform-skills

JavaScript★ 1,094⑂ 222▲ 9 stars
→
7

jacke-pp / open-yoki

JavaScript★ 583⑂ 39
→
8

sleepy-zone / ai-ref-library-cn

JavaScript★ 504⑂ 137
→

More AI Rankings