dx-corp/dspy-advanced-prompting
State-of-the-art prompting techniques implementation with DSpy - Manager-style prompts, role personas, meta-prompting, and more
About dx-corp/dspy-advanced-prompting
dx-corp/dspy-advanced-prompting is an open-source project on GitHub, mainly written in Python. State-of-the-art prompting techniques implementation with DSpy - Manager-style prompts, role personas, meta-prompting, and more It currently holds 61 stars and 4 forks with 0 open issues, and was last pushed on an unknown date (repository created unknown).
Project Overview
AI Homed tracks it on the AI Prompt Engineering board.
GitHub Repository Details
README
DSpy Advanced Prompting Techniques
A comprehensive implementation of state-of-the-art prompting techniques used by top AI startups, built with DSpy.
DSpy is a framework for algorithmically optimizing LM prompts and weights. Instead of manually crafting prompts, DSpy allows you to define high-level signatures and automatically optimize them.
🚀 Overview
This project demonstrates advanced prompting strategies that go beyond simple prompt engineering. Each technique is implemented as a reusable DSpy module with real-world examples.
📋 Implemented Techniques
1. Manager-Style Hyper-Specific Prompts
- 6+ page detailed prompts structured like onboarding documents
- Complete role definitions, responsibilities, and performance metrics
- Example: Customer Support Manager, Code Review Manager
2. Role Prompting with Clear Personas
- LLMs adopt specific personas for better task alignment
- Includes veteran engineer, therapist, data scientist personas
- Multi-persona orchestration for complex tasks
3. Task Definition and Planning System
- Breaks complex workflows into predictable steps
- Recursive task decomposition
- Dependency management and execution orchestration
4. Structured Output (XML/Markdown Tags)
- Enforces consistent response formats
- Supports XML, Markdown, JSON, and hybrid formats
- Parahelp-style verification tags
5. Meta-Prompting for Self-Optimization
- LLMs analyze and improve their own prompts
- Iterative refinement based on output quality
- Prompt evolution using genetic algorithms
6. Few-Shot Prompting with Real Examples
- Challenging bug analysis examples (Jazzberry-style)
- Adaptive example selection
- Chain-of-thought few-shot learning
7. Prompt Folding for Multi-Step Workflows
- One prompt triggers generation of deeper prompts
- Supports recursive, pipeline, branching strategies
- Workflow management for complex tasks
8. Escape Hatches for Uncertainty
- Prevents hallucination through uncertainty admission
- Graceful degradation when confidence is low
- Domain-specific disclaimers
9. Thinking Traces and Debug Logging
- Exposes model's internal reasoning
- Visual thinking trace representation
- Comprehensive debug information
10. Evaluation Framework
- Test cases more valuable than prompts
- A/B testing framework
- Regression testing and performance metrics
11. Model Distillation Pipeline
- Use large models for prompt crafting
- Deploy on smaller, cheaper models
- Production optimization strategies
🛠️ Installation
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/evalops/dspy-advanced-prompting.git
cd dspy-advanced-prompting
Create virtual environment (recommended)
python3 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate # On Windows: venv\Scripts\activate
Install dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
Set up environment variables
cp .env.example .env
Edit .env with your API keys
✅ Testing & Validation
Status: FULLY VALIDATED ✨
The project has been comprehensively tested and verified:
- ✅ Valid Python syntax in all files
- ✅ Proper class and module organization
- ✅ All required files present
- ✅ DSpy integration working with OpenAI API
- ✅ Manager-style prompts generating detailed responses
- ✅ Escape hatches properly handling uncertainty
- ✅ Core techniques functional with real LLMs
Full Validation
To validate the project structure and modules:
# 1. Activate virtual environment (recommended)
source venv/bin/activate # On Windows: venv\Scripts\activate
2. Install all dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt
3. Run structure validation (no API calls)
python validate_with_dspy.py
Real API Testing
To test with actual LLM API calls:
# 1. Set up API keys in .env file
cp .env.example .env
Edit .env and add your OpenAI API key
2. Run real API validation
python validate_with_real_api.py
Sample output:
✅ All techniques validated with real API calls!
API Usage Summary:
• API calls made: 6
• Estimated tokens: 1,282
• Estimated cost: $0.0019
Running Examples
After validation, run the examples:
python main.py # Interactive demo of all techniques
python examples/quick_start.py # Quick start examples
What Gets Validated
The validation script checks: 1. Dependencies: All required packages are installed 2. Module Creation: All DSpy modules can be instantiated 3. Basic Functionality: Core features work without API calls 4. API Keys: Environment is configured for LLM usage
📖 Quick Start
Basic Usage
import dspy
from src.prompts.manager_style import create_customer_support_manager
from src.techniques.escape_hatches import EscapeHatchResponder
from src.techniques.thinking_traces import ThinkingTracer
Configure DSpy with your OpenAI API key
dspy.settings.configure(lm=dspy.LM(model="gpt-4o-mini", api_key="your-key"))
1. Manager-style prompts for detailed responses
support_manager = create_customer_support_manager()
response = support_manager(
task="Handle a customer complaint about data loss",
context="Customer reports losing 2 weeks of project data"
)
print(response) # Detailed, empathetic customer service response
2. Escape hatches for uncertainty handling
escaper = EscapeHatchResponder()
result = escaper("What will Bitcoin's price be next month?")
print(f"Confidence: {result['uncertainty_analysis'].confidence_level}")
Output: Confidence: 0.15 (correctly identifies high uncertainty)
3. Thinking traces for step-by-step reasoning
tracer = ThinkingTracer(verbose=True)
solution = tracer("How many weighings to find the odd ball among 12?")
Shows detailed reasoning process with [THOUGHT], [HYPOTHESIS] markers
Real-World Examples
# Bug analysis with few-shot learning
from src.techniques.few_shot import FewShotLearner, create_bug_analysis_examples
examples = create_bug_analysis_examples()
analyzer = FewShotLearner(examples)
bug_analysis = analyzer("App crashes when uploading files > 50MB")
Provides structured analysis: root cause, impact, solution
Code review with role personas
from src.techniques.role_prompting import create_veteran_engineer_persona
engineer = create_veteran_engineer_persona()
review = engineer(
task="Review this SQL query for security issues",
context="f\"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id={user_id}\""
)
Identifies SQL injection vulnerability with detailed explanation
🏗️ Project Structure
dspy-advanced-prompting/
├── src/
│ ├── prompts/
│ │ └── manager_style.py # Manager-style prompts
│ ├── techniques/
│ │ ├── role_prompting.py # Role personas
│ │ ├── task_planning.py # Task decomposition
│ │ ├── structured_output.py # Output formatting
│ │ ├── meta_prompting.py # Self-optimization
│ │ ├── few_shot.py # Few-shot learning
│ │ ├── prompt_folding.py # Workflow folding
│ │ ├── escape_hatches.py # Uncertainty handling
│ │ ├── thinking_traces.py # Debug traces
│ │ └── model_distillation.py # Distillation
│ └── evaluations/
│ └── evaluation_framework.py # Testing framework
├── examples/ # Usage examples
└── tests/ # Unit tests
📓 Interactive Jupyter Notebooks
New! Explore techniques hands-on with our interactive notebooks:
- Manager-Style Tutorial - Build hyper-specific prompts with comprehensive examples
- Technique Comparison - Side-by-side performance analysis of all techniques
- When to Use What - Interactive decision guide for choosing techniques
- Escape Hatches Deep Dive - Master uncertainty handling and confidence calibration
# Start Jupyter and explore
pip install jupyter matplotlib
jupyter notebook notebooks/
🧪 Running Examples
# Run manager-style prompt example
python -m src.prompts.manager_style
Run thinking traces demo
python -m src.techniques.thinking_traces
Run evaluation framework
python -m src.evaluations.evaluation_framework
📊 Performance Metrics
Each technique includes built-in evaluation metrics:
- Accuracy: How well the prompt performs its intended task
- Consistency: Stability across different inputs
- Robustness: Performance on edge cases
- Efficiency: Token usage and execution time
🔧 Advanced Usage
Creating Custom Manager-Style Prompts
from src.prompts.manager_style import ManagerStylePromptConfig, ManagerStyleAgent
config = ManagerStylePromptConfig(
role_title="Senior Data Analyst",
department="Business Intelligence",
key_responsibilities=[
"Analyze business metrics",
"Create actionable insights",
"Build dashboards"
],
# ... more configuration
)
analyst = ManagerStyleAgent(config)
Building Evaluation Suites
from src.evaluations.evaluation_framework import TestCase, EvaluationSuite
test_suite = EvaluationSuite(
name="Custom Test Suite",
test_cases=[
TestCase(
id="test_1",
input="Your input",
expected_output="Expected output",
evaluation_criteria={"contains_all": ["key", "terms"]}
)
]
)
🚀 Production Deployment
The model distillation pipeline helps optimize prompts for production:
from src.techniques.model_distillation import DistillationPipeline
pipeline = DistillationPipeline()
deployment = await pipeline.distill_and_deploy(
prompt="Your complex prompt",
production_requirements={
"max_latency_ms": 500,
"min_accuracy": 0.9,
"daily_volume": 100000
}
)
🛠️ Troubleshooting
Common Issues
"Module not found" errors:
# Make sure you're in the project directory and virtual environment
cd dspy-advanced-prompting
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
API key issues:
# Check your .env file
cat .env
Make sure OPENAI_API_KEY is set correctly
Import errors:
# Run from project root, not inside src/
python -c "from src.prompts.manager_style import create_customer_support_manager; print('✓ Imports working')"
Performance Tips
- Use
gpt-4o-minifor cost-effective testing - Cache results with DSpy's built-in caching
- Monitor token usage with the validation scripts
- Use escape hatches to avoid hallucination costs
📚 Key Insights
1. Prompts as Onboarding Docs: Treat prompts like you're onboarding a new employee 2. Test Cases > Prompts: Evaluation frameworks are more valuable than the prompts themselves 3. Uncertainty is Good: Better to admit uncertainty than hallucinate 4. Debug Everything: Thinking traces reveal model reasoning 5. Start Big, Deploy Small: Use large models to craft, small models to serve
🤝 Contributing
Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit pull requests or open issues.
📄 License
MIT License - see LICENSE file for details
👤 Author
Created by Jonathan Haas (jonathan@haas.holdings)
🙏 Acknowledgments
Inspired by prompting techniques from leading AI startups including:
- Parahelp (manager-style prompts)
- Jazzberry (few-shot bug analysis)
- And many others pushing the boundaries of prompt engineering